User talk:Edunoramus

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ordered Liberty has been accepted

Ordered Liberty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ordered liberty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fourteenth Amendment. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rounding out the ordered liberty page

Thank you for the extensive contributions you have made to ordered liberty, which is an important topic in American political philosophy.

Though your contributions have been well written and generally sourced appropriately, the page's content could use some refinement to improve the article's compliance with editing guidelines. Two principal recommendations are as follows:

Check for any original research you may have inadvertently contributed. As an example, the purported origin of the phrase "ordered liberty" is cited to a SCOTUS case mentioning the phrase, rather than to a secondary source saying that the origin is from that case. (Effectively, the primary source citation makes the Wikipedia article a secondary source. Often, however, Wikipedia acts as a tertiary source.)
Try to correct any undue balance inadvertently given to certain content. This is not to suggest that you are pushing a particular viewpoint—only that the content should reflect what the source material on this topic says. For example, though the Dobbs decision certainly has relevance to debates on ordered liberty, the history and historiography of the concept is far broader. The "ordered liberty" page would ideally reflect the broader scope of the concept and only cover the Dobbs decision in proportion to its coverage in the broader, relevant literature on the topic.

These are just suggestions for how to make the article even better than it is now. Let me know if you have any questions! --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 02:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]